Showing posts with label wine tasting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wine tasting. Show all posts

Friday, July 5, 2013

How do they Get the Blueberries into the Wine?: A Primer on Wine Aromas


Wine tasting is very serious business
I poured two tastes of Petite Sirah, and then stood back and watched as the two women in front of me swirled their glasses and inhaled deeply. 


"It smells fruity," one of them said.

"Yes," replied her friend, "sort of like blueberries!"

"Exactly," I responded. "Blueberry is a very common aroma in Petite Sirah."

The women smiled with satisfaction, pondering the wine as they sniffed and sipped. But then the first woman's face contorted in confusion. "Wait a second..." she began, "how do they get the blueberries into the wine?!"


To the novice wine drinker, this can be an extremely confusing concept. Sometimes a wine has such a pronounced smell of blueberries, or of roses, or of ripe fresh peaches, that it seems impossible that the scent could have been achieved in any other manner than by tossing a bag of groceries in with the fermenting grapes. But unless you are making blueberry wine, peach wine, or rose wine (all of which do exist), the only fruit that will ever see the inside of the oak barrel or stainless steel fermenting tank is in fact, the grape.

So how do wines made from little more than fermented grapes and yeast end up smelling like, well, anything but? And what makes each wine different? There are a number of factors that contribute to the aroma (or the bouquet--more on that later) of a wine. 

One of the most important determinants of a wine's aroma is the type of grape(s) from which it is made. Each grape contains tiny amounts of aromatic and phenolic compounds--chemical compounds with very unromantic names like methoxypyrazine, which gives Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon Blanc their characteristic grassy aromas, or zingerone, the vaguely onomatopoeic moniker for the compound responsible for spiciness (zing!) in Syrah. Monoterpenes, a class of compounds including linalool and geraniol, lend a floral quality to Gewürztraminer, Muscat, and Riesling. If you were to pick a ripe grape off of the vine and eat it, you may have a hard time perceiving any of these chemical compounds. Fermentation, however, has a magnifying effect on their aromas, and they are often clearly perceptible in the finished product. 
Then there is the "bouquet"--a somewhat controversial and mostly unnecessary term that, depending on who you ask, either means the aromas that come from the winemaking process or the aromas that come from aging. Between you and me, I'm fine with calling them all aromas. Or scents. Or smells. Whatever works for you. But although the term doesn't matter, these two processes have an undeniable effect on the way a wine smells. A winemaker can choose to age a wine in stainless steel barrels, preserving the purity of the fruit aromas, or in oak barrels, which (depending on their age and region of origin) can impart hints of toast, cedar, vanilla, or coconut. The decision to allow a white wine such as Chardonnay to undergo malolactic fermentation can result in a scent not unlike buttered popcorn, due to the conversion of crisp, tart malic acid (think green apples) to soft lactic acid (think yogurt). Allowing a wine to sit with the dead yeast cells (lees) following fermentation will lead to a yeasty, brioche-like smell. An aging wine will see its fresh fruit aromas turn to those of dried, cooked, or baked fruit, while other earthy, floral, mineral, or even animal aromas develop as well. The scent of the wine will become much more layered and complex as it matures, although if you let it mature for too long, its aroma will turn to that of a nice vinegar for cooking.

Oak barrel aging can lead to toasty, woody, and vanilla flavors in the finished wine
Of course, despite the fact that there is some science behind all this, that doesn't mean everyone is going to perceive the same thing all of the time, or even half of the time. Everyone's nose and palate is different, and we all have different thresholds of perception. Personally, I can almost never detect the smell of mint in a wine until someone else points it out, but I am always among the first to pick up on the smell of plum. Some people can instantly discern that a wine that has been ever-so-slightly damaged by cork taint, while others may happily gulp down the entire bottle without batting an eye. This doesn't mean anyone is "wrong," any more than one would be "wrong" for preferring vanilla ice cream to chocolate.

the aroma wheel
If you want to get better at this wine-sniffing thing, you have options. A very useful tool is the aroma wheel, the creation of Ann C. Noble, a sensory chemist and former U.C. Davis professor. You can buy one for $6, and use it to identify scents by narrowing them down from the general (fruity) to the sort-of-general (berry) to the specific (strawberry), helping to make the process a little less daunting. Another suggestion, courtesy of my former Intro to Wines professor, is to learn what things smell like. It's pretty simple. Go to the farmers' market or a spice shop, pick things up, and sniff them. Commit their scents to memory. If you don't know what gooseberries smell like, find some gooseberries in the produce aisle and take a big whiff. Of course, if anyone sees you do this, you might have to buy them. Or, if you have lots of money and cannot figure out what to do with it, spend some of it on an aroma kit like Le Nez du Vin, which basically lets you do all of that without the awkward trip to the grocery store. 
Le Nez du Vin aroma kit
At the end of the day, the most important thing to do while drinking a wine is to enjoy it, not to try to think of obtuse flowery descriptions (unless, of course, you are a wine reviewer). But identifying aromatic characteristics can be fun, especially with a group of friends. And the more you drink, the more creative your descriptions will become (some excerpts from my tasting group's late-night notes: 'kinda like a burrito,' 'Aunt Jemima maple syrup,' 'third grade snack time with apple juice and graham crackers' and 'Pert Plus shampoo - green apple scent.' Don't take yourself too seriously. And remember, practice makes perfect. 

How Much do we Need to Know About Wine in Order to Enjoy it?


You don't need to be "that guy" in order to enjoy wine.

As anyone with even a mild interest in fermented grape juice is aware, there are many misconceptions that people have about wine--for example, that all wines bottled under screwcap are cheap, that "dry" means the same thing as "tannic," or that sulfites in wine cause headaches (look for all of these myths to be debunked in future blog posts!). But one of the most harmful misconceptions out there is that you need to be knowledgeable about wine in order to enjoy it. This belief has caused many people to eschew wine in favor of beverages like beer or vodka, which they feel they have permission to imbibe without having to think about it too much. "Winophobics" fear that they will not be able to appreciate the often expensive beverage without being well-versed in its nuances, or that there will be some sort of exam that they will fail and embarrass themselves in front of the sommelier or a snooty colleague. 

A few years ago, I asked a beer-loving friend if she wanted to accompany me to a Friday evening wine tasting at Alphabet City Wine Co. in New York, a fun and laid-back store with friendly and knowledgeable staff and a great wine selection. She looked as if I had just asked her to help me give my great-grandfather a sponge bath. 

"But--I wouldn't know what to say about the wines!" she stammered, a look of panic flashing across her face. 

Confused, I replied, "do you think they're going to quiz you on the wines or something? You don't need to say anything about them. You just drink them. It's fun."

We ended up skipping the tasting and going out for beers instead, but since that conversation I have often thought about the peculiar link between wine enjoyment and knowledge. There is no other food or beverage that I can think of that people feel they actually cannot enjoy without knowing a lot about it. Sure, there is plenty to learn about cheese, mushrooms, or even whiskey, that may make their consumption somewhat more enjoyable, but, personal taste aside, I have never seen anyone refuse the chance to try any of those things based on a lack of sufficient understanding thereof. 

The fact of the matter is, unless you are trying to become a wine professional, all you really need to know is whether or not a wine tastes good to you personally. Sure, it can be fun to learn more, especially when you find a region or grape variety that you particularly enjoy. But this can only enhance cognitive pleasure, not sensory pleasure. That is to say, recognizing that the mysterious liquid you just sipped is a Burgundy from the 2006 vintage will give you the same satisfaction as acing a difficult question on a math test, but it will not make the wine taste any better.

Conversely, knowledge of wine can sometimes actually reduce your enjoyment of the beverage. Having too much information about a particular wine--for example, that the producer has an excellent reputation, that it came from a superior vintage, or that someone like Robert Parker gave it 100 points--may cause you to set your expectations of quality too high. It's kind of like finally going to see a movie after hearing rave reviews for months--very few can live up to that kind of buildup. 

Last year, I was at a restaurant that is well-known for its excellent wine selection. The bartender had overheard enough of the conversation between myself and my drinking companion to know that we were total wine nerds, and generously began to pour us blind tastes of every bottle he had open. When I sipped one of them, I felt as if I had reached some sort of enlightenment. I suddenly understood the reason for all of the pomp and circumstance surrounding wine. I turned to my companion, and managed to utter a short, staccato sentence: "This. Is. The best. Wine. I have ever. Tasted."

Smirking, the bartender interjected, "don't drink that too fast. It's DRC."

This was one of those record-scratch moments for me. For the uninitiated, DRC stands for Domaine de la Romanée-Conti, the Burgundy estate considered to be one of the best (and certainly the most expensive) wine producers on the planet. I had always longed to try one of their wines, but believed my lack of sufficient income would be an insurmountable roadblock.  I was thrilled to discover that, independently of its reputation, I thoroughly enjoyed such a highly sought-after wine. My companion, however, had not yet had a chance to taste it before the revelation was made. She took a sip.

"I mean, it's good," she shrugged, "but it's not amazing." We will never know for sure, but I suspect that if I had not been the one to take the first sip, our evaluations might have been reversed. 




Psychology can have a massive impact on the way we experience wine. There have been many experiments where wine professionals have been swayed in their evaluations of wine by subtle psychological cues. In 2001, University of Bordeaux researcher Frédéric Brochet conducted two revealing experiments that are often recalled today when discussing the subjectivity of wine. In the first one, fifty-seven wine professionals were asked to evaluate two glasses of wine--one white and one red. The experts marveled at the "jamminess" and "crushed red fruit" of the latter, completely unaware that both glasses contained the same white wine, one of which had been tinted with red food coloring. Not one of them noticed this. 

In the second experiment, an average-quality Bordeaux wine was poured into two different bottles--one a high-end, well-respected Grand Cru, and the other just a regular vin de table. I'm sure you can guess how the ratings differed between the two wines! The "Grand Cru" was heralded as being “agreeable, woody, complex, balanced and rounded,” while the "vin de table" was derided as “weak, short, light, flat and faulty." 

When I serve wine, I like to play these tricks with people as well (but don't worry, I'll always come clean immediately after!). If you tell me that you hate Merlot but love Cabernet Sauvignon, there's a good chance I will pour you a small taste of Merlot and say "try this Cab!" It is not intended to be cruel, but rather to help you free your mind from the prejudices you may have developed from listening to other people talk about wine. If you aren't sure what wine you would like to try and I pour you a taste, I generally won't tell you what it is until after you've formed your thoughts on it. Your opinion should not be influenced by where it's from or who made it. By paying attention to our own tastebuds rather than our highly suggestible brains, we can become more comfortable with the idea of tasting wine.


Note: if this subject interests you and you would like to read some thought-provoking discussion about it, I highly recommend the book Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine. It is by no means a light read, but it's fascinating! 

An Anderson Valley Adventure, Part 2: Why Going Wine Tasting is Good for More than Just Drinking




Ferrington Vineyard
After having blogged about the Anderson Valley AVA last week, I was even more anxious to visit than I had been previously. I have known for quite some time now that I prefer the wines of that region to almost any others in the state of California, but despite the rave reviews I have often heard, I had never been to Mendocino at all. Less than twenty-four hours after the trip, I am already trying to plot my return.

Highway-128 may be one of the best arguments there is in the debate between California and New York. Beginning two hours North of San Francisco, just off of the sunburned hills of Route 101, this winding road is not for the faint of heart, but adventurous drivers will reap worthwhile rewards in the form of stunning scenery. Between the lush redwood forests, vineyards, rivers, and lakes, there is no shortage of opportunities to entertain yourself simply by looking out the window during the drive, which is useful since you won't have cell phone service for most of it. All of this leads to some very lovely photos, but equally importantly to a greater understanding of that region's wines. 

State Route 128
When we checked out of our hotel in the town of Mendocino and prepared to head south, away from the coast, the chilly air was damp enough to instantly render my hair straightener's recent hard work irrelevant. When we stopped at the first winery about twenty miles inland, a sweater was still very necessary, yet by the end of our fourth and last stop (only six miles further from the coast), it seemed I couldn't get the car's air conditioning cold enough. Experiencing this firsthand helped me deepen my understanding of what I had previously read about what makes the Anderson Valley unique--the cooling effects of the fog rolling off the Pacific Ocean (so thick early in the day that we couldn't see a bridge as we drove across it), and the intensity of the diurnal swing (the difference between the daytime heat that aids in sugar development and the cool nights that help the grapes to maintain acidity). Later, when looking at a detailed map of the region, the names of the vineyards I had seen on the wine labels ceased to be meaningless, arbitrary words--suddenly, they were valuable sources of information that I could use to predict my enjoyment of Anderson Valley wines. 


Wiley Vineyard
The wines made with fruit from the Wiley Vineyard had tended to be my favorite throughout the day, and a quick glance at the map revealed that this northerly vineyard is the closest to the ocean, and therefore the coolest. The wines tended to be light in body, low in alcohol, and marked by mouthwatering acidity. The wines of the Savoy Vineyard, quite a bit further inland, leaned more toward a bigger, bolder style, with darker fruit. After having driven through the area and feeling the temperature change, both with the direction of travel and the time of day, it was very clear to me how weather (among many other factors) had played a part in the development of the wines I had sampled.

If you're interested in learning more about the wines you enjoy, visiting the region where they are made can be an invaluable (and enjoyable!) tool. Even if you are not tasting wine, just being aware of the area's conditions during the growing season can help you understand and recall the specifics of a particular vintage. If you were in Northern California in the summer of 2008, you'll remember the forest fires that plagued wine growing areas and left many grapes tainted by smoke, producing a unique crop of wines with an aroma not dissimilar to a Fourth of July barbecue. If you visited Germany and nearly froze to death in the winter of 2010, you'll likely never forget the record-breaking cold that produced some of the most highly acidic (and delicious) rieslings in recent history. You can read all you want about wine, but of course nothing compares to getting out there and experiencing it for yourself.


For the record, the highlights of my tasting experience included:

2010 Navarro Vineyards Anderson Valley Pinot Noir, $19.50
light and earthy with soft red fruit and spice

2007 Navarro Vineyards Anderson Valley Late Harvest Riesling, $29 (375ml)
apricot, honey, and pineapple, with remarkably balanced acidity

2010 Breggo Cellars Ferrington Vineyard Gewürztraminer, $25
exotic aromas of rose petals, spice, and lychee; crisp, refreshing, and bone dry.

2010 Phillips Hill Ridley Vineyard Chardonnay, $30
clean nose (no oak or malolactic) with ripe apple and citrus. Round, pleasant mouthfeel.

2009 Phillips Hill Wiley Vineyard Pinot Noir, $38
cola, cocoa, cherry, vanilla, and baking spice.

Did I mention these wines are crazy affordable??